Shared Purpose, Different Worlds: Strengthening Community Organization–Academia Partnerships for Cross-Sectorial Research Impact

community organization–academic partnerships co-governance collaboration continuum community engaged research transdisciplinary research community engagement equity empowerment

Authors

  • Mohammad M. H. Raihan Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, Canada
  • Nashit Chowdhury Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada , Canada
  • Irfan Hyder
  • Tanvir Turin
    turin.chowdhury@ucalgary.ca
    University of Calgary, Canada
November 22, 2025
November 22, 2025

This paper explores how community organization and academia partnership (COAP) may foster equity, reciprocity, and shared power in research with community organizations. It argues that authentic and ethical partnerships require understanding the diverse and complex ecosystem of community actors (public, private, nonprofit, and grassroots) and their unique capacities, accountabilities, and connections to the communities they serve. Partnerships can be conceptualized across four-level continuum of arrangement — (a) minimal participation, (b) advisory or consultative involvement, (c) active collaboration, and (d) co-governing. Minimal involvement occurs when the community organization is informed and provides basic support, such as facilitating access to participants. Advisory involvement arises when the organization serves as a consultant or advisor, offering feedback without formal decision-making authority. Active collaboration reflects a deeper partnership in which the organization co-creates the research, participating in study design, data collection, and analysis. Finally, co-governing represents full shared leadership, with the organization and academic partners jointly making decisions, setting priorities, and guiding the implementation of the project. Partnership arrangements can be from limited communication to shared leadership and decision-making. These growing levels represent increasing trust, mutual accountability, and co-ownership of both process and outcomes. Drawing on lessons from practice and theory, the paper proposes that COAPs thrive when they balance academic rigor with community priorities through structures that embed fairness, transparency, and respect. Practical considerations for sustaining ethical and equitable COAPs include transparent communication, fair governance structures, equitable resource sharing, mutual capability bridging, and inclusive dissemination strategies. Together, these elements transform COAPs into dynamic partnerships that align academic rigor with community priorities, strengthen trust, and promote sustainable, community-driven collective impact. 

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.